2004 BMW X3 vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2004 BMW X3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,925 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X3 (225 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X3 weights approximately 865 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X3 (290 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2004 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW X3 | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | X3 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2925 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2480 mm |
