2004 BMW X3 vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 2004 BMW X3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,925 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X3 (225 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X3 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X3 (290 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm). This means 2004 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW X3 | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | X3 | 132 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 2925 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2560 mm |
