2004 BMW X3 vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2004 BMW X3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector RD 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector RD 180 would be higher. At 2,925 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X3 (225 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2000 Vector RD 180. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Because 2004 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Vector RD 180. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X3 (290 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 2004 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X3 | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
Make | BMW | Vector |
Model | X3 | RD 180 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2925 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |