2004 BMW X3 vs. 2003 Tata E
To start off, 2004 BMW X3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Tata E would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X3 (184 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2003 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X3 weights approximately 444 kg more than 2003 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Tata E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X3 (237 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata E. (210 Nm). This means 2004 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW X3 | 2003 Tata E | |
| Make | BMW | Tata |
| Model | X3 | E |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2810 mm |
