2004 BMW X3 vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X3 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 225 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 558 kg more than 2004 BMW X3.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X3. (290 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X3 | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X3 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2925 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 2383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 132 L |