2004 BMW X3 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X3 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 BMW X3. (184 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW X3.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle (316 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X3. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X3 | 2009 Volkswagen Caravelle | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | X3 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 316 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 95.9 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 80 L |