2004 BMW X3 vs. 2010 Audi S6
To start off, 2010 Audi S6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X3 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2010 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi S6 (435 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 2004 BMW X3. (184 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi S6 weights approximately 217 kg more than 2004 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi S6 (539 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X3. (237 Nm). This means 2010 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X3 | 2010 Audi S6 | |
Make | BMW | Audi |
Model | X3 | S6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 435 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 539 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 2035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2847 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 80 L |