2004 BMW X3 vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,925 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X3 (225 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (211 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X3 weights approximately 355 kg more than 2012 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (349 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X3. (290 Nm). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X3 | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | BMW | Audi |
Model | X3 | TT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2925 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 349 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 60 L |