2004 BMW X3 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X3 (225 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Because 2004 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X3. (290 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW X3 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | X3 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2925 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
