2004 BMW X3 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2004 BMW X3. (184 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW X3.
Because 2004 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X3. (237 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW X3 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | X3 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
