2004 BMW X3 vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X3 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (240 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 BMW X3. (225 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 330 kg more than 2004 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X3. (290 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X3 | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | X3 | XC90 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2925 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 80 L |