2004 BMW X5 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2004 BMW X5 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X5 (355 HP) has 285 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X5 weights approximately 1410 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X5 (500 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2004 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW X5 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | X5 | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4802 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2275 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2420 mm |
