2004 BMW X5 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 BMW X5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X5 (228 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X5 weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X5 (290 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm). This means 2004 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X5 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | X5 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 131 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 80.5 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2110 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 50 L |