2004 BMW X5 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X5 (355 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac STS. (320 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac STS.
Because 2004 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X5 (500 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac STS. (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X5 | 2006 Cadillac STS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | STS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 4556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 428 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.5 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 64 L |