2004 BMW X5 vs. 2008 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2008 Cadillac XLR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,566 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2004 BMW X5. (228 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X5 weights approximately 472 kg more than 2008 Cadillac XLR.
Because 2004 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X5. (290 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X5 | 2008 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | XLR |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 4566 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 420 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2110 kg | 1638 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 68 L |