2004 BMW X5 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X5 (355 HP) has 183 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X5 (500 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2004 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW X5 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | X5 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4799 cc | 3979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 172 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 87 mm |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.1 seconds | 12.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.5 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 72 L |
