2004 BMW X5 vs. 2009 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2004 BMW X5. (228 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X5 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XK.
Because 2004 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW X5. (290 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X5 | 2009 Jaguar XK | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | X5 | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2110 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 70 L |