2004 BMW Z4 vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2004 BMW Z4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 BMW Z4. (168 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 910 kg more than 2004 BMW Z4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW Z4 | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z4 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3390 mm |
