2004 BMW Z4 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2004 BMW Z4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW Z4 (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW Z4 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW Z4 (300 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2004 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW Z4 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Z4 | CU-X |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |