2004 BMW Z4 vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW Z4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1215 kg more than 2004 BMW Z4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW Z4 | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | BMW | Fisker |
| Model | Z4 | Karma |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 36 L |
