2004 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 445 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2004 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Blenheim | 1980 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Bristol | Mercury |
Model | Blenheim | Lynx |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2400 mm |