2004 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 475 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2004 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Blenheim | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Bristol | Mitsubishi |
Model | Blenheim | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2390 mm |