2004 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1986 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 55 kg more than 2004 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 1986 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1986 Jeep Cherokee has manual transmission. 1986 Jeep Cherokee will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Blenheim | 1986 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | Blenheim | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 87 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 76 L |