2004 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1989 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 566 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2004 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Blenheim | 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
Model | Blenheim | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2630 mm |