2004 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 538 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Blenheim | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | Blenheim | Equator |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3260 mm |
