2004 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1045 kg more than 2004 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Blenheim | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Bristol | Land Rover |
| Model | Blenheim | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2550 mm |
