2004 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE weights approximately 485 kg more than 2004 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Blenheim | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
| Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
| Model | Blenheim | F-TYPE |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2909 mm |
