2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Fighter (525 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 417 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 174 kg more than 2004 Bristol Fighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Fighter | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Bristol | Talbot |
Model | Fighter | Baby |
Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 7994 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 525 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |