2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1954 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Fighter (660 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 435 more horse power than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. (225 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 38 kg more than 2004 Bristol Fighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Fighter | 1954 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | Fighter | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 5114 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 660 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 96.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.6 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2600 mm |
