2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1965 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Fighter (525 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 317 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 534 kg more than 2004 Bristol Fighter.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Fighter | 1965 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Fighter | Calais |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 525 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 95 L |
