2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Fighter (525 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 421 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 1046 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Fighter | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Bristol | Lotus |
Model | Fighter | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7994 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 525 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 45 L |