2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1980 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 474 kg more than 2004 Bristol Fighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Fighter | 1980 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Fighter | Brougham |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7994 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 525 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3090 mm |