2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron

To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Fighter (525 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 402 more horse power than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 326 kg more than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Bristol Fighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bristol Fighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Bristol Fighter 1981 Cadillac Cimarron
Make Bristol Cadillac
Model Fighter Cimarron
Year Released 2004 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7994 cc 2844 cc
Engine Cylinders 10 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 525 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1476 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4530 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2580 mm