2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1981 Ford Probe
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Probe would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 170 kg more than 1981 Ford Probe.
Because 2004 Bristol Fighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bristol Fighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bristol Fighter (787 Nm) has 639 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Ford Probe. (148 Nm). This means 2004 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Ford Probe. 1981 Ford Probe has automatic transmission and 2004 Bristol Fighter has manual transmission. 2004 Bristol Fighter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Ford Probe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Fighter | 1981 Ford Probe | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Fighter | Probe |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 660 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 787 Nm | 148 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2410 mm |