2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 326 kg more than 1983 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2004 Bristol Fighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bristol Fighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Fighter | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Bristol | Plymouth |
| Model | Fighter | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 525 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2260 mm |
