2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1984 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Bristol Fighter | 1984 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Bristol | Pontiac |
Model | Fighter | Trans Am |
Year Released | 2004 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7994 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 525 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2570 mm |