2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Fighter (660 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1993 Jaguar XJ220. (542 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1993 Jaguar XJ220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bristol Fighter (787 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Jaguar XJ220. (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Jaguar XJ220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Fighter | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
| Model | Fighter | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 660 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 787 Nm | 642 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 340 mm |
