2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 Bristol Fighter is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Fighter (660 HP) has 607 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 890 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Fighter | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Bristol | MCC |
| Model | Fighter | Smart |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 660 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1460 mm |
