2004 Bristol Fighter vs. 2012 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Bristol Fighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Bristol Fighter would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bristol Fighter (525 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Virage. (490 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Virage.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bristol Fighter (714 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Aston Martin Virage. (569 Nm). This means 2004 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Aston Martin Virage.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Bristol Fighter | 2012 Aston Martin Virage | |
| Make | Bristol | Aston Martin |
| Model | Fighter | Virage |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 525 HP | 490 HP |
| Torque | 714 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
