2004 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LaCrosse (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2004 Buick LaCrosse.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick LaCrosse | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | LaCrosse | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3300 mm |
