2004 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1965 Seat 1500
To start off, 2004 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LaCrosse (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1965 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1965 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 425 kg more than 1965 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick LaCrosse | 1965 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Buick | Seat |
| Model | LaCrosse | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2660 mm |
