2004 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1984 Zastava 750

To start off, 2004 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LaCrosse (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1984 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1984 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 945 kg more than 1984 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1984 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LaCrosse (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Zastava 750. 2004 Buick LaCrosse has automatic transmission and 1984 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1984 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Buick LaCrosse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: