2004 Buick LaCrosse vs. 2013 Aston Martin Rapide

To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Rapide is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick LaCrosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick LaCrosse would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Rapide is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Rapide weights approximately 375 kg more than 2004 Buick LaCrosse.

Because 2013 Aston Martin Rapide is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Aston Martin Rapide. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Rapide (601 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Buick LaCrosse. (311 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Rapide will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Buick LaCrosse.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Buick LaCrosse 2013 Aston Martin Rapide
Make Buick Aston Martin
Model LaCrosse Rapide
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3564 cc 5935 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 238 HP 0 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 311 Nm 601 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Premium
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1615 kg 1990 kg
Vehicle Length 5040 mm 5019 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 2140 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2989 mm