2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 1946 Buick 40
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 216 kg more than 2004 Buick LeSabre.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick LeSabre | 1946 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Buick | Buick |
| Model | LeSabre | 40 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 5249 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 97.1 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 109.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1845 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3000 mm |
