2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 714 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick LeSabre | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Buick | Riley |
Model | LeSabre | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2380 mm |