2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 1969 MG 1100
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1969 MG 1100. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1969 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 789 kg more than 1969 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 MG 1100. (104 Nm). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick LeSabre | 1969 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Buick | MG |
| Model | LeSabre | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2380 mm |
