2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick LeSabre | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | LeSabre | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |