2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 1978 Lada 1200
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1978 Lada 1200. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1978 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 684 kg more than 1978 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Lada 1200. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick LeSabre | 1978 Lada 1200 | |
Make | Buick | Lada |
Model | LeSabre | 1200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 39 L |