2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 1989 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 634 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick LeSabre | 1989 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Buick | Plymouth |
| Model | LeSabre | Colt |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2400 mm |
