2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 1999 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 638 more horse power than 2004 Buick LeSabre. (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 549 kg more than 1999 Lotec C 1000.
Because 1999 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 678 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Buick LeSabre. (312 Nm). This means 1999 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Buick LeSabre.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick LeSabre | 1999 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Buick | Lotec |
Model | LeSabre | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 5498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 990 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |